Fighting a DUI drug case in Florida that involves a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) requires a strategic approach. DREs are specially trained officers who evaluate suspected drug-impaired drivers using a standardized 12-step evaluation process. We are among few lawyers in the state certified in DRE.  Here’s how we challenge DUI drug cases:

​

1. Challenge the DRE’s Training and Qualifications

​

DRE Certification:

Certification Status: Verify that the DRE officer who evaluated you was properly certified and trained according to the standards set by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) or other relevant organizations. Inadequate training or expired certification can undermine the credibility of their evaluation.

​

Training Records:

Training Documentation: Obtain and review the DRE’s training records and certification to ensure they meet the required qualifications. Any discrepancies or gaps in training can be used to challenge the reliability of the DRE’s testimony.

​

2. Examine the DRE Evaluation Process

​

Evaluation Procedures:

Adherence to Protocols: Ensure that the DRE followed the standardized 12-step evaluation process correctly. Deviations from established procedures can impact the accuracy of the evaluation.

Documentation and Reports: Review the DRE’s reports and documentation from the evaluation. Look for any inconsistencies or errors in how the evaluation was conducted and documented.

​

Assessment Conditions:

Testing Environment: Examine whether the evaluation was conducted under appropriate conditions. Factors such as poor lighting, noise, or other environmental distractions can affect the accuracy of the assessment.

​

3. Challenge the Evidence of Impairment

​

Physical Symptoms:

Medical Conditions: Present evidence of any medical conditions or physical issues that could have mimicked signs of drug impairment, such as neurological disorders, chronic illnesses, or other health conditions.

Inconsistent Symptoms: Challenge the DRE’s observations of physical symptoms by presenting evidence or expert testimony that these symptoms were not indicative of drug impairment but rather due to other factors.

​

Drug Testing Results:

Toxicology Reports: Obtain and review the toxicology reports for the blood or urine tests. Analyze the results to determine if the drug levels detected were consistent with impairment.

Drug Detection and Interpretation: Consult with a forensic toxicologist to interpret the results and determine if the detected substances were at levels that could impair driving.

​

4. Question the Reliability of the DRE’s Testimony

​

Cross-Examine the DRE:

Credibility: During cross-examination, question the DRE about their evaluation process, training, and any potential biases. Highlight any inconsistencies or errors in their testimony.

Testimony Limitations: Challenge the DRE’s ability to accurately assess impairment based on subjective observations and their interpretation of physical symptoms.

​

Expert Testimony:

Forensic Expert: Hire a forensic toxicologist or other relevant experts to provide testimony on the reliability of the DRE’s evaluation and the interpretation of drug testing results. An expert can offer an independent analysis and challenge the validity of the DRE’s findings.

​

5. Address Legal and Procedural Issues

​

Rights and Procedures:

Constitutional Rights: Ensure that your constitutional rights were not violated during the arrest and evaluation process. Any rights violations can impact the admissibility of evidence.

Legal Protocols: Verify that all legal procedures were followed correctly, including obtaining consent for blood or urine testing and ensuring that you were not subject to illegal searches or seizures.

​

Procedural Errors:

Challenge Errors: Identify and challenge any procedural errors or deviations from standard practices during the evaluation and testing process. Procedural errors can undermine the validity of the evidence against you.

​

6. Present Alternative Explanations

​

Medical or Environmental Factors:

Alternative Causes: Present evidence that alternative factors, such as medical conditions or environmental influences, could explain the symptoms observed by the DRE or the results of drug tests.

Other Explanations: Offer alternative explanations for any signs of impairment that do not involve drug use, such as fatigue, stress, or illness.

​

Conclusion

​

To effectively fight a DUI drug case involving a DRE in Florida, we need to carefully scrutinize the DRE’s qualifications, evaluation procedures, and the evidence of impairment. Challenge the reliability of the DRE’s testimony, review the toxicology reports, and address any legal or procedural issues. Consulting with experienced DUI attorneys and forensic experts is crucial in building a robust defense and addressing the complexities of challenging a DUI drug case.